Home Blog Page 81

Lethal Weapon S01E02 Recap

0

“Surf N Turf” was the title of the episode this week, and it stayed true to the action and hype level we had seen in the previous episode. Eventually I hope we will move on from Riggs being in his grieving mode, of which again played a role in the plot this week. We however cannot deny how his grief is still fueling his disturbed and dangerous behaviour after he found out his home back in Texas was for sale.

Once again the case of the week did not matter at all, though it was interesting to have a pregnant woman help Riggs with his ever changing emotions. Which in the end proved to improve the relationship between Riggs and Murtaugh. Clayne Crawford is still playing the character of Riggs brilliantly; his grief and subsequent insanity because of it is not overplayed at all. At least not yet. One cannot deny however, that it is a true joy watching the character of Riggs develop so far.

LETHAL WEAPON: Clayne Crawford in the "Surf n Turf" episode of LETHAL WEAPON airing Wednesday, Sept. 28 (8:00-9:00 PM ET/PT) on FOX. ©2016 Fox Broadcasting Co. CR: Jordin Althaus/FOX
LETHAL WEAPON: Clayne Crawford in the “Surf n Turf” episode of LETHAL WEAPON

They are still problems with the show however- the dialogue still at times feels out of place and forced. Yes this is Lethal Weapon, yes this is not meant for the Oscar viewing audience, however for these characters, the banter must be filled with more personality.

Like I mentioned before, the storyline from this week was for the most part forgettable. A cocktail waitress who’s knocked up with an arms dealer’s baby is saved from a sniper bullet by Riggs- then to find out later in the episode that the agent from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, is the very arms dealer that got the woman pregnant. This then leads Riggs and Murtaugh to a rescue situation in a fireworks factory after the agent kidnaps her. You can pretty much guess what happens next- EXPLOSIONS!

Overall the episode this week was passable; however more needs to be done to the script in order to keep us as the viewers interested in action filled buddy cop show.

‘Kickboxer: Vengeance’ Review

0

Kickboxer: Vengance is the 2016 reboot of the 1989 martial arts film Kickboxer, which starred Jean-Claude Van Damme (who appears in Vengeance as the main character’s mentor). The film stars Alain Moussi as Kurt Sloane; a kickboxer hell bent on avenging the death of his brother, Eric, who was killed in the ring by champion kickboxer Tong Po. Written by Dimitri Logothetis and Jim McGrath and directed by John Stockwell, the film also stars Jean-Claude Van Damme, Dave Bautista, Gina Carano, Georges St-Pierre and Darren Shahlavi (in his final role).

kickboxerposter

This movie is boooooooooooring.

It has a paper-thin plot and barely enough story to justify the events that takes place. And it’s a cliché story at that. It is surprisingly dull for a film that even if it’s bad should at least be fun because of the martial arts.

It’s not even that.

And the fact that it ends with the very cliché ass-pull of power and motivation that suddenly makes the hero stronger and better does not help.

In terms of the actors and stuntmen executing the choreography and making the fights look convincing, the fight scenes for the most part were alright. But they were boring to watch.

There was one fight scene in particular however, that was half-assed and weak; the kicks and punches were more like light taps and you could see the actors holding back so that they didn’t injure each other. Their movements were slow and didn’t look like they had any real power behind them.

Every single character in this movie is blander than bland. They have no charm, no charisma, no personality. Nothing. They are wholly uninteresting. To call them one dimensional would be to give them more character than they actually have. At least the kickboxers look good shirtless, as does that one female police officer, Liu, in that one sex scene.

Which, speaking of, is boring. And awkward.

The “romance” between Kurt and Liu came out of nowhere. There was nothing prior to them kissing the first time that made any indication that they were even remotely attracted to each other besides the fact that he is male and she is female. There was absolutely no chemistry between Moussi and Lane; they were so stiff and mechanical in that sex scene. They did not look like they wanted to have sex with each other.

The acting in this movie is terrible. The actors bring nothing to their roles; they just recite their lines at each other and try (and fail) to make convincing facial expression and that’s about it.

They act like they are trying too hard to project an emotion. Which they are. There is no feeling behind the performance and because of that you can’t connect with their already flat character that you don’t care about.

Dave Bautista is the best actor in the film and that’s because he doesn’t have to say or do much. All he had to do was look mean and for him that’s easy.

There was also an announcer who had really lame dialogue that delivered his lines like he was in a bad fighting game. He even said “Can I get an ‘Amen!’” at one point.

They did win points for having the Thai characters speak Thai and not English just for the sake of the audience. But quickly lost those points when two small Thai children had American accents for some reason.

This film is not engaging at all.

If you like mediocre action movies with no story or plot, characters that struggle to be interesting, painful to watch acting and a little showing of boobs, then maybe watch this? The fight scenes aren’t even good enough to keep it entertaining. It’s fine enough for a one-time watch. If you have access to the video on demand services this was released on (iTunes, Amazon Video, Google Play, Vudu) then stay home and watch it there.

Bidding War over Twitter heats up

0

A fierce bidding war over the purchase of Twitter, found a new player earlier week. Disney has allegedly joined other potential buyers after rumours surfaced Friday of the possible sale. These rumours come as no surprise as the company was suffering from slow revenue growth since going public in 2013. Other potential buyers of the company are Microsoft, Salesforce (a US cloud computing company) and Google, among other tech companies. The mere thought of a potential purchase of Twitter has shaken up the stock markets- after the rumours started to spread Friday; shares of twitter went up by 20%. They climbed another 3% Monday which helped Twitter’s market value to surpass $20 billion.walt_disney_pictures

Of course, Disney wanting to purchase Twitter should come as no surprise to anyone. After all this is the same company that back in 2012 decided to purchase George Lucas’ company, LucasFilm, for $4.06 billion. This studio is the one responsible for the Star Wars and Indiana Jones; two of the most lucrative franchises to have ever been created for the big screen. Even going back to 2009, they purchased Marvel for $4 billion, it’s been estimated that of late since the buyout, the Marvel Cinematic Universe has made over $10 billion. So if Twitter is indeed purchased by Disney, it can expect to make some serious money and investments in the long run. Its been proven than having a big presence in social media greatly increases profits for most companies. So its clear Disney as well as other buyers are looking to leverage the social media power Twitter has at its disposal.

 

Once Upon A Time S06E01 Recap

0

SOME SPOILERS AHEAD.

Another season, another crisis.

Emma and the rest of Team Good have quite a few problems on their hands. Which is just another Sunday for them really.

ouat-season-6

Crisis number one this season?

Emma is going to die – if not at the end of the season, then by the mid-season finale – at the hands of some shadowy, hooded figure that will stab her in the gut with a sword. According to Hyde there is always a villain who comes along and kills The Saviour and according to Jafar Saviours never get a happily ever after.

But we all know Emma is in no real danger. She’s the main character. She has plot armour. Plus, Team Good always manages to find a way out of the worst of situations, so we know that they will here too.

If Emma ever tells them that is.

Because once again, when met with a problem, Emma decides to take it on alone rather than share her burden with her loved ones.

I understand the whole orphan thing and growing up alone and having to learn to depend on herself. But after six seasons it would be nice to see Emma not do that for once and just confide in them from the start. If she did that though, there wouldn’t be as much dramatic tension so the writers won’t actually have her break that habit.

No theories yet as to who the hooded figure is, but Emma’s story hasn’t captured me yet so I’m not that invested.

I am invested in Regina’s though. She is probably the most complex character on the show who has the most interesting story right now.

Which leads us to crisis number two; the Evil Queen is alive and well.

I was waiting for her to appear all episode and there wasn’t much of her to see unfortunately. Lana Parrilla hammed it up a bit too much in that performance, but the Evil Queen was always fun to watch and her wardrobe was always amazing.

My favourite scene of the episode was near the end when Regina and Snow were discussing their shared history. It really made me realise how far they’ve come in their relationship and how much Regina has grown and changed.

I also forgot that she was Snow’s stepmother so it reminded me of that little fact as well.

And can Regina finally have her happy ending? She’s more than earned it.

The part of her story I’m not looking forward to though is the brewing conflict between her and Zelena. Can we not have her be evil again? We really don’t need her teaming up with the Evil Queen.

Zelena is a character that I think has been on the show for far longer than they needed to be. The first time she showed up last season I thought “Why is she here?” They ultimately found a use for her, but she really should have left the show after the Wizard of Oz storyline came to a close. If she goes back to being evil, then that will be several steps backward for her character.

It is sweet seeing her and Regina bond and be sisterly but it feels like she has no real reason to be in the show anymore. She’s just there.

Crisis number 3 is Hyde himself.

I’m curious as to what it is he has planned for Storybrooke and the people from The Land of Untold Stories that he brought there. I thought they were meant to be allies of his but that doesn’t seem to be the case. He didn’t have much to do in this episode except sit in a cell and threaten then by threatened by Emma (I’m not so sure should be trusting and confiding in him; he’s not trust worthy and also she should really let at least Hook know about the whole she’s going to die thing).

And then there’s Rumple and Belle who have a crisis of their own that in no way has anything to do with what is going on in the rest of the show. It is the same crisis/problem they have been experiencing for quite a while and for far too long.

We all love Rumple. For much of the show he was the only character worth watching it for. But that’s no longer the case if all we’re going to get from him now is seeing him and Belle continue with the same old problem.

This season began not with a bang, but with a whimper. It was…okay. Underwhelming at best. If this episode is any indication as to what the rest of the season will be like then recapping it will be hard because really, not much of anything worth talking about happened. This first episode was kind of boring.

Random thoughts:

  1. You’re not Jafar…
  2. Where are Jasmine and Genie?
  3. Aladdin’s British?
  4. Hyde sounds like Tom Hardy’s Bane.
  5. Who is the oracle chick?

Once Upon a Time airs every Sunday at 8 PM on ABC.

Snapchat Announces Google Glass Rival

0

If you thought that you could not get enough of Snapchat, despair not, for Snapchat has heard your cries. On Saturday via its website, Snapchat announced a brand new piece of hardware called, wait for it, Spectacles. These new “Spectacles” are sunglasses with a built in camera to record Snaps for the app. Basically they are a watered down version of Google Glass– which will not run you $1000.

Imagine one of your favorite memories,” the announcement on the company’s website reads. “What if you could go back and see that memory the way you experienced it? That’s why we built Spectacles.”

So just like Google Glass, the Spectacles have an integrated video camera built in; also included are Bluetooth and WiFi capabilities which should aid in uploading the short video clips to the app. In the same post they also promise a new “circular” video format created specially for use in the device. On a side note the company also announced its re-branded its name to Snap Inc. The current CEO, Evan Spiegel, said this move reflects the company’s future. “Now that we are developing other products, like Spectacles, we need a name that goes beyond just one product,” he wrote in a blog post. Snap Inc. is described on its website as “a camera company.

The Spectacles will cost $130 and will be available in three colors ― black, teal, and coral. No solid release date has been announced as yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqkOFLBSJR8

10 Things About Lynmarie Jack

0

New feature alert!

Don’t miss this treat that’s coming Sunday! Learn all about Lynmarie Jack and what she’s doing with Hopscotch Treats! I got a chance to watch her make the magic happen as she walked me through her process and at the end, I tasted two of her popular flavours — tastiest interview yet!

 

Don’t forget to click on the photo to enlarge it!

‘The School for Good and Evil’ Review

0

the-school-for-good-and-evil

The School for Good and Evil is a 2013 New York Times Best Selling, middle-grade, fairy tale, fantasy novel by Soman Chainani, the first in a trilogy. Sophie and Agatha are an unlikely pair of best friends; where Sophia is bright and beautiful, Agatha is dark and ugly. In their town of Gavaldon, every four years two children are kidnapped by the mysterious School Master and sent to the titular school, where they are trained to be characters in fairy tales of their own. This year it’s Sophia and Agatha’s turn.

If there is any character in this book that I have incredibly strong feelings about, it’s Sophie. I have not come across a character who is so irredeemably despicable since Joffrey Baratheon. Sophie is the absolute worse. She is vain, arrogant, manipulative, dishonest, fake, selfish, ungrateful, never takes responsibility for her choices and actions and their consequences, materialistic…she is positively loathsome.

The novel does offtumblr_n4cd2vmrk81tzv7qyo2_1280er up some insight into her past, specifically as relates to her parents, but even thought I can understand why it may be that she is this way, the fact of who she is renders me unable to sympathise – or even empathise – with her. She’s just too repulsive a character.  There is nothing likeable about her.

And then there’s Agatha. These two girls really are the antitheses of each othertumblr_n4cd2vmrk81tzv7qyo3_1280.

Although she can be very sour and mean, particularly in the beginning of the novel, Agatha is sweet, kind, compassionate, genuine, humble, loving, nurturing…everything that Sophie is not. She’s certainly not a perfect character, but she’s definitely more balanced in terms of positive and negative traits than Sophie is.

My favourite characters however are Hester, Anadail and Dot. They are perhaps the most interesting characters in the entire novel and they have a wealth of personality between them.

The twist at the beginning was kind of predictable but the way it unfolded throughout the narrative is indicative of Chainani’s talent in weaving a coherent plot and compelling story. Sophie and Agatha came into their own in very specific ways and their journey was frustrating (in a good way; Chainani succeeded in making me invested in the characters and the story) but satisfying in that it felt earned.

The novel is in some ways a critique and deconstruction of fairy tales. In many ways it follows the typical rules and tropes of a fairy tale – heroes being conventionally attractive and villains being misshapen and hideous – but in others it doesn’t.

It pretty much says at one point that good and evil are not black and white and that everyone is a mixture of both, and the secondary characters tend to reflect that. In fact, the “Good” students have a lot of Sophie’s personality traits and the “Evil” students have a lot of Agatha’s to the point that the “Evil” students are in many ways more “good” than the “Good” students.

Given what happens to students who fail, it makes you question how good “Good” can be when they know what happens and they allow it to; considering that it’s really quite cruel on its own, but also in the light of the fates of these students once they leave the school.

Chainani explores gender roles in fairy tales, especially with the female characters and at The School for Good (The School for Evil has a greater degree of gender equality). A character literally questions the concept of the damsel in distress and the novel on the whole subverts the idea of what and how a princess should be. This is not the crux of the novel, but it is an underlying theme.

The comparisons to Harry Potter, are unavoidable; it is a boarding school where children learn magic, with a school building that is magical in and of itself and has a dangerous forest filled with dangerous magical creatures after all. There’s even something that, as described, is fairly similar to a thestral.

But those are the extent of the similarities for the most part.

With or without the twist in the beginning, if this had been a typical fairy tale, the story would have ended very differently; much in the same way as Snow White or Sleeping Beauty. Such an ending would have been okay – not just to fairy tales but also to the super hero genre. Tragic, but okay. I cannot say if the ending the novel actually has is better, but I appreciate it more because it’s different.

The novel is a little slow; I thought I was around a third of the way into it but it turned out it was more than half. It didn’t feel like the more than mid-way point. It felt more like I was still somewhere in the first act. It took a while to pick up but when it did it really went. Which wasn’t exactly a good thing because the ending felt very rushed and it was very abrupt.

Despite being a children’s books you do not need to be part of the target demographic to enjoy The School for Good and Evil. It is truly an all ages novel that is perfect for parents to read with their children. It’s very well written, with (mostly) likeable characters and has some pretty good messages to boot.

 

This book is available from:
Amazon
Audible
Barnes and Noble
Book Depository

‘Blair Witch’ Film Review

0

Blair Witch­ is the 2016 direct sequel to the classic and revolutionary 1999 found footage horror film The Blair Witch Project. Written by Simon Barrett and directed by Adam Wingard, the film follows James Donahue – brother of Heather Donahue from the first film – his friends, a film student and two guides, who make their way into the infamous Black Hills Forest in search of Heather. The film stars James Allen McCune, Callie Hernandez, Brandon Scott, Corbin Reid, Wes Robinson and Valorie Curry.

20160907102320-blair-witch

The majority of this film is a boring, uninteresting trod through nothing. It is such a slow build. That only really pays off in the last half hour, or perhaps less. It’s an hour and twenty-nine minutes long. Which means you have to wait an hour until anything worthwhile happens.

It would be a bit of a stretch to say that the snail pace build-up was worth it. But it did really demonstrate the psychological – and in some instances physical – deterioration of the characters.

Speaking of the characters; they’re totally forgettable. None of them stand out. They’re all fairly dull and flat. You don’t care about them at all.

The only real amusing thing concerning them was trying to guess who would die first. Three of the characters either had something done to them or did something that in a horror movie would mean that they will be the first to die or that that something would at least get them killed.

And those three things do pay off later.

Despite the lack of connectedness with the characters, the acting was pretty good. The performances were believable.

One technique the filmmakers used that led nowhere; lingering shots.

It’s a horror movie. If the camera focuses on something for a little too long then the audience assumes that something is about to happen; something that was camouflaged suddenly moves in the frame, something comes into frame, a jump scare even. But nothing happens.

The filmmakers do succeed in stimulating a sense of dread however.

It’s particularly frustrating when in one sequence in the middle of the film, it returns to a specific shot multiple times and every time it does the dread builds until the sequence is over and nothing came from it.

It’s a tease in the worst way.

And speaking of jump scares.

There are a lot. And they aren’t even effective. Being startled and being afraid are not the same thing. And these jump scares aren’t startling. At one point, following a jump scare, a character even says; “Will everyone stop doing that?” And that is exactly how it feels by that point.

When the film does pick up though, it’s immediate. It’s enthralling and you can’t take your eyes off the screen; as much as you may want now that things have gotten unnerving and creepy. Not outright scary but enough to make you watch from between your fingers.

Blair Witch is okay. It does somethings right, it does more things not so great. The pacing is far too slow, it takes too long to get to the actually decent part of the film, the characters are “blah”, there are too many jump scares and the filmmakers employ a technique for seemingly no reason. But the acting is serviceable and when you do get to the actually good part of the film you almost forget how bored you were in the beginning.

G. Addinton Forde Interview – Route 10 & St Philip Book Launch

0

We got to interview G. Addinton Forde about his new book, the St. Philip Book at the launch of the book and the new TV series Route 10! Check out what he had to say about the book!

Gaming News: 23rd September, 2016 Edition

0

We start off gaming news this week with a tale so ridiculous it could only be true. A game developer who is infamous for releasing a barrage of poor unimaginative games, got the boot from Valve off Steam this week. Nothing strange about that, however the way the full situation escalated is where it gets interesting.

Digital Homicides got kicked off Steam this week because they filed a lawsuit against 100 steam users; these John/Jane Doe have been accused of misdemeanor counts of “harassment,” “stalking,” and “cyber-bullying.” Quite serious allegations, however we must quickly look back at how exactly Digital Homicides has reached this point.

jim-sterling
Its Jim !@#$ing Sterling son!

Back in 2014, Digital Homicide got angry at a fairly infamous YouTube game review named Jim Sterling. Insinuating that Mr. Sterling had “mocked” their game Slaughtering Grounds, they issued a copyright notice onto his video, thus getting it temporarily taken down. Jim, after noticing the ridiculous way this particular developer was acting towards a normal game review, began to shed even more light on the otherwise forgettable game. This back and forth “shitstorm” led to Digital Homicide’s boss James Romine, suing Jim for $10 million (£7.7 million). Yes you saw that right, $10 million, for speaking ill about their (ridiculous) game.

Cyber-bullying is always a bad thing and should never be excused, however this developer seems to think suing unknown individuals is the best course of action. It’s not, and trying to subpoena Valve into handing over the identities of their customers was never going to fly. When it all boils down, they are suing any and every one for saying awful things about their usually awful games.

Seldom does a week goes by where Konami does not make headlines news, and this week was no different. One of its former game directors and biggest fan (yes sarcasm) Hideo Kojima, had the opportunity to comment on Konami’s latest entry into the Metal Gear franchise “Metal Gear Survive.” He was asked whether or not he had anything to do with the new game, and in response he said “it had nothing to do with me.” Then jokingly went on to say, “If I had worked on that game, it would have mechs in it.”

Hideo Kojima
Hideo Kojima

Metal Gear Survive is the first “Metal Gear” game to be released after Kojima’s infamous exit from Konami. The game uses most of assets in “Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain,” with an open world design that includes zombies with melee and survival mechanics. Its trailer debut on YouTube currently sits at 21,075 likes to a massive 109,316 dislikes. The reason for this is obvious- most people see this new game as an insult to the original franchise, with Konami just trying to milk the Metal Gear name for every last dime.

Finally we have news for the move beloved Rocket League. The next update for the popular game shall be the AquaDome DLC, slated to arrive in October. The update will introduce an underwater arena set within a dome, which will allow players to look at the sea life while having some fun in the new setting. If one pays close enough attention, you would see the clear hints to the BioShock universe, a nice homage for fans of that game. Psyonix said more information about the update will be revealed closer to release.

Tell us what you think of these three stories down below- for more gaming controversies and gaming updates, stay locked to Zeitgeist Entertainment Magazine.

ZEITGEIST!
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.